It is probably not as smooth or efficient as a radical alternative would be but you know what?

To try and have it all feels dangerously normie.Īnyway, my edgily non-edgy choice is to attempt to have it all via the System76 GNOME Auto Tiling extension. This is an extreme maverick lifestyle choice, using a tiling window manager which is innocent of all the other widgets and fripperies of modern mainstream Desktop environments. Thus it is on-brand to switch to old-school naked window managers, such as i3, xmonad etc.

The convention of tiling window manager users is of course that they make the unconventional choice to throw ou a well-supported desktop environment like GNOME in favour of a zany one that supports tiling. There is some tiling-style layout support in GNOME. If I get a Nobel prize from it then great, that will be a data point in favour. Were those days of being confused about how to switch apps paid back in terms of thousands of 1-second savings?Īre the 1-second savings even real, when half my apps freak out when using tiling window managers? It certainly makes it feel like I must be more efficient, because it is difficult, but this seems to be cognitive-dissonance-based reasoning. Open question: Does this make anything more efficient, for me, the user? Here’s whyīasically, instead of arranging apps in stacks of overlapping windows, these try to slice the screen up into non-overlapping windows in a manner conducive to keyboard automation.

Why Desktop Environment Users Don’t Understand Tiling Window Managers.

Super User: Why use a tiling window manager?.

Why use a tiling window manager over a floating one? : linux.

The other paradigm to stacking window managers. Each of the fragments contains a whole other xmonad session, but it is ok because of tail recursion.

Tiling windows manager windows 10